Since I got one cardio related article in my mail and another jumped at me as a paid ad on the internet right after I decided to write this article. Both of those articles I got looked like they were based on scientific research, but apparently this article (CZ) was not enough and I still need to go over some information.
First, let’s go over the basics of thermodynamics. It’s something you cannot simply gloss over even though many trainers do jsut that. „Thermodynamics is the branch of physics that deals with the relationships between heat and other forms of energy. In particular, it describes how thermal energy is converted to and from other forms of energy and how it affects matter. “ (source) Vychází přitom z obecných principů přeměny energie, které jsou popsány čtyřmi termodynamickými zákony.
Energy cannot be destroyed, it must be transformed into some form (of which there are many). For us the most important are:
Which means that even though so many trainers are trying to ignore this, for burning one need to be in energy deficit, for gaining in energy plus. But weight in itself can be influenced in other ways too. If you are gaining muscles very fast (which we can usually see in people who take steroids) it’s possible to burn fat whilst on big caloric intake. Just as well there are studies that show it is possible to build muscle in calorie deficit. But change of weight does not only mean gain or loss of fats.
Based on this law we can arrive to a logical conclusion, that cardio is not important for weight loss. It doesn’t matter if you’re burning sugar or fat. For weigh loss calorie deficit is the msot important. That’s why it doesn’t matter if you’re doing cardio exercises on an empty stomach or you do HIIT or low intensity steady-state cardio (LISS). So burning 400kcal during cardio or modifying your diet has the exact same effect from the point of view of fat reduction. Also, all exercises including strength training are very similar concerning energy output (study).
If you look at the amount of fat burnt during cardio, the number is far lower that most people think. It’s usually less than 100g of fat (study)
Let’s start with oh so popular HIIT training (which includes almost all interval trainings, tabat etc.)
One of the main reasons why HIIT is so perfect is EPOC. The immense burning even after the training finnished is overhyped. In fact, EPOC takes up only 6-15% of the overall oxygen consupmtion during the training (study) In other words, EPOC will be around 50kcal.
Then we often see sprinters and American footbool players in comparison to HIIT. Make no mistake, the sprinters‘ training and their interval running has nothing to do with HIIT. Standard resting time between sprints is 5+ minutes for a 5-15s dash. Not a 20s exercise + 10s rest as in tabata. There are even studies that compare the two (here) and they found out that with HIIT you train more like a football player than a sprinter.
There were 3 test groups:
Those who did only strength training gained 4,1% pure muscle mass, ST + LISS gained 3,6% and with HIIT only 1,8%.
This next study here shows 17% gain over 0% with those who had added HIIT. They were people with no training which iseven a bigger problem, because those who are only starting to exercise usually react to any stimulus, so even HIIT should be enough, but is isn’t.
We can even go as far as to claim that LISS is far better than HIIT because of one single argument: you can do it longer, thus burn more (back to thermodynamics) (study here)
The only aspect in which HIIT undoubtedly wins, is saving time. It’s not supposed to sound sarcastic, because even this aspect can be crucial for some people. If you can only find 10minutes 3 times a week, some form of sprints or intervals would still be the better solution than doing nothing.
As mentioned above, it’s all about energy deficit. So it doesn’t matter if we’re burning sugar or fat. The biggest problem about exercising on an empty stomach is the risk of burning muscle. Which is the last thing you want when trying to lose weight (study)
is energetically speaking very demanding, only people do not see it as such. Calorie burn works the same. The heavier you lift, the harder it is for your body metabolically. One of the reasons why is, that the body uses anaerobic system a lot. Which is why people who are starting with light weight have no problem to lift many times as opposed to people with 100-200kg. The higher number of reps, the more you use your aerobic system as well. Of course resting time betwee series is also on aerobic system. The main benefit of strength training for burning of fat is muscle gain. We have to strive for elevating out REE, moving a body with bigger muscle mass is energetically more demanding than moving with a body of the same weight but no muscle.
With cardio there is one problem – it disrupts building of muscles and strength. With HIIT we have seen it’s the worst ever. It’s mainly about AMPK vs mTOR, but it’s probably being made into a much bigger monster than it actually is (here).
Moreover, the aerobic system is best at preventing all sorts of cardiovascular diseases and stress, which is also a huge problem nowadays. HIIT however works as total opposite. Also, training in itself is stress for the body, more so if you go to one of the supr circuit trainings where you lay on the ground by the end in a pool of your own vomit… (here is a study showing this kind of exercise is nonsense) Our heart also reacts differently to LISS and HIIT since it’s a muscle. If your only concern isn’t loosing weight or building muscle but you are also active in some other sports, having a good aerobic system is good for you in order to avoid injury because your game won’t deteriorate as it progresses and you start to get more and more tired. This article however is focused on cardio and not the fuctioning of energetic systems. In other words LISS is not the only way of improving your aerobic system. Especially athletes use many different ways (study here)
For most people a well built strength training is capable of building a good and fuctional aerobic system without any additional cardio exercises.
Let’s look once again at the almost non existent difference between the energy consumption of cardio and strength training based on this study
They were comparing a 30 minute strength training (3×10 fullbody training), HIIT/circuit training, and repetitive cardio of 70% intensity and almost no differences were found.
The main problem with HIIT is, that people think they are burning way more than with e.g., strength training. Which, as we have shown, is not true.
Don’t rely on your fitness bands 100%, the numbers they show, especially calories burnt, are usually way off.
I hope this article helps answer your questions about cardio and puts an end to bickering about which is better and why.
Did you like the article and find it helpful? I’d be grateful if you shared it.
Strength and fitness trainer
Owner and founder of Barbar gym
Holder of Czech and international certificates from training and nutrition